Chivalry in Pakistani men: Active or dormant
“Considering the place was empty, and I was there alone, I expected the worst from the waiters. Surprisingly, during this entire ordeal, not one of them acted the slightest bit offensive. They were complete and utter gentlemen. They may not have come from highly educated and affluent backgrounds but each one of them was probably more honorable and brave than majority of the men I come across daily in my social gatherings. (Saba Khalid, 2011)”
Chivalry is a type of guidelines given to men by either their family
background or their social status. According to Merriam Webster, it is a code
of conduct associated with the medieval institution of knighthood was termed as
chivalry. Later In the 19th century, there were attempts to revive chivalry for
the purposes of the gentleman of that time. Researcher also termed chivalry as
“Benevolent sexism” i.e. chivalrous attitude toward women that feels favorable
but is actually sexist because it casts women as weak creatures in need of
men's protection. (Social Psychology Network)
When it comes to chivalry in Pakistani men; mixed opinions emanates in
mind. Some will describe them to be least chivalry-practicing people while many
think that they are really bad/ non-sensitive. Although their opinions are
based upon their back grounds; yet they have solid grounds and depict the
society.
It is believed that the
trend of practicing chivalry is reducing in our men. Whatever may be the
reason, let’s not forget the response of women also as men have been branded
with the title of feminists on the basis of their behavior (some of which was
the need of the time) and then complain about this changing trend. “When women
are re-situated in a traditionally feminine role (whether through violence or a
man holding doors) they are reminded of feminine stereotypes, like womenare the
weaker sex (Kimberly Belmonte in February, 2012)”. “Benevolent sexism,” but we
might call it chivalry wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent
sexism? (Kilianski, S.E. & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Sex Roles, 39,
333-352.)This irony gives rise to two interlinked questions that is chivalry a
moral duty and if it is then is it leading to gender biasedness in the society?
In order to elucidate this
confusion; I conducted a research among our society through separate
questionnaires for men and women. The respondents ranged from teenager to early
fifties. In the survey it was viewed that 38.8% women answered that they do
feel biased attitude like hatred, blame men for all social problems etc. While
90% men said they feel that this world is only for women. 88.88% women think that chivalry is the
moral duty of men and believe on the fact that it is the needed at all times
while on the other hand only 11.11% people think that chivalry is actually the
hidden gender disparity from men. . 80% men think that chivalry is, reality
their moral duty and consider it a part of their religious teachings.
22.22% people think that it
is the root cause of sexism. 77.77%
women think that men are in fact incomplete without chivalry while 83.33%
people think that men need to change their attitude about practices in front of
women but 16.6% think that it should be eliminated from the society. 40% said
that they showed chivalry to unknown women regularly. Only 66.6% women said that the men of their
show chivalry around them however 38.8% women said that unknown men are good to
them on regular basis 16.6% said that it is not a frequent habit while 33.35%
women said that men show chivalry with them all the time. 100% women said that
we are losing our moral values. 88.88% women said that chivalry is reducing
from or society. Nearly all of them said that this is the easiest thing to show
their morals, brought up and etiquettes to women. 90% men agreed to the fact
that chivalry has reduced in them among which 20% regarded women liberation as
a reason, 50% said that it is due to the unawareness of men and 30% men said
that the impact of media and society is the main reason behind it.
When Ms. Sobia Mansoor,
lecturer at Fatima Jinnah Women University was asked about the chivalry in
Pakistani men, she said “Chivalry is very important in our society. It is the
part of Pakistani culture and courtesy of Pakistani men and cannot be separated
from each other.” She gave several examples of chivalry inour society like how
porters help women in carrying their stuff as compared to men; how women are
given priority in queues. “Sometimes they don’t even have to stand in queues at
all” She said. “Not everyone practices benevolent sexism nor everyone; all
these practices are part of their life which they practice without any defined
intention; they do this because it makes them to be good to others.”
When we see the lacking
trend of chivalry in Pakistani men; the other side of the picture should also
be checked. Although many women complain about the “uncomfortable feeling”
whenever they come across different type of men in daily life yet this fact
cannot be denied that our men constitute the most civil, gentle and respectful
army (along with their courageous abilities) and have never been reported to be
disrespectful to women; a perfect combination of chivalry, ability and code of
conduct. Yet the benevolent sexism is yet observed. Moreover, despite of low rate
of literacy and social imbalance; men form the other social backgrounds do have
a gentle side as well.
“Considering the place was
empty, and I was there alone, I expected the worst from the waiters.
Surprisingly, during this entire ordeal, not one of them acted the slightest
bit offensive. They were complete and utter gentlemen. They may not have come
from highly educated and affluent backgrounds but each one of them was probably
more honorable and brave than majority of the men I come across daily in my
social gatherings. (Saba Khalid, 2011)”
Chivalry is essential,
irrespective of the consequences; to maintain balance in society what matters
the most is the proper coordination of all the factors active in the society.
What matters the most is the inner feeling in a person. He can be either
benevolent sexist or chivalrous, whatever may suit him, but the impact of his
behavior would be carved on society.
Comments
Post a Comment